Thursday, December 30, 2010
Dead Air
Sunday, December 12, 2010
leaving the foxhole
a blow was thrown
bob, weave
duck.
sweat glistens
on the brow, on the knuckles
raining the mat.
but no blood, not yet.
this is how it progressed:
swinging swords
from a sheath that is a closedmouth
sever the thickness
stale air splintered by breath
hot like steamin rain gutters.
but no blood, not now.
this is how it escalated:
mortor fore spots the sky
like flocks of geese,
until they shower down.
shellshocked and shunned
so run for cover, return fire.
but no blood, not even.
this is how it climaxed:
a hand off through door crack
skin contact with the enemy
rules of engagement says to aid
so with the formality of conflict
a tissue paper cease fire.
but no blood, not cleaned.
this is how it dragged:
a layer of cinder block bricks
stacked with breach of trust
through espionage and invasion.
a cold war of finger pointing
when an arm rejected
the offer of peace.
but no blood, not flowing.
this is how it resoluted:
peace talks and treaties
enemy contact established
when a soft hand grips the rough
hand of the adversary.
weapon stock piles are scrapped
so bridges can be built with their
soldered flesh-
but no blood, not for a pointless war
when words are sharp
and there is a shortage of bandages.
mdtesauro@gmail.com Sign out
View in: Mobile | Desktop
©2010 Google
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Synonym to: absorbing, amusing, appealing, attractive, compelling, curious, engaging, engrossing, entertaining, gripping...
I’ve been told I’m interesting. Interesting. Interesting. What a word. The word it self is interesting, in turn, this extract a response by the sound. The ebb and flow of the reverberation made between the “in” and the “tere” tailed by the “sting”.
But those are things I learned in linguistics. Linguistics is a class that was interesting. We learned about language, the spoken form coughed from the throat curled off the tongue like an illicit act. So there are noise-forming words with meaning, which in turn, are also interesting.
I suppose there are interesting aspects about me. I have dimples. I have a deviated septum. I'm articulate. I can drink more alcohol than the average person. These might be interesting. Or more so, they might be inches above the average stimuli of positive emotion. That sentence was interesting.
But here is an interesting snippet about me: I wore a body cast up to my armpits from the age of two to three. Yet, I only remember what I’ve seen of that moment in my life from pictures. To fine-tune that statement, I remember the pictures I’ve seen of myself not the year I spent immobile or the way the plaster felt against my skin. I don't remember the year I spent learning to walk after that. I remember a Polaroid I’ve seen of myself.
Photographic memory. I have one of those two. That’s interesting.
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Keyboard Sized Scars
I’ve been told I deal with pain best through my writing. As though each word, each letter that is stamped onto the blank, white page is a representation of myself. Maybe the letters are the smallest instances of my interior. I form them into words to give a better image of where I’m hurting. I put these words together to form sentences, sentences of courses to show why I’m hurting.
Or the “best” might, just might be a transient notion.
Yet, I think there is a truth to that statement. But the words in that previous claim, those pleasant words are in reverse. I do my best writing when I deal with pain. I’ve spread much of my core across word doc files and text scripts and social network blurbs throughout my time with a computer. There is less of a filter when I’m hurting, less of an inhibition. Because I figure, what does it matter what people think about this clause or this use of diction or this formatting style if I’m already hurt? Why would it matter?
It doesn’t when you’re a good writer. Nothing hurts you when you are a good writer. Or at least nothing hurts your writing when you’re a good writer.
I’m a great fucking writer. But I’m hurting.
Maybe that’s why this sentence, this sentence right here, right now sounds so good to me. As I read it in my head, a choir, a church one at that, accompanies it. My favorite choirs are in Southern Baptist churches. They sound good when they hurt too. They sound good in my head as I type this.
Of course, I have doubts about all this. Well, about the writing not the pain. I know I’m in pain. I know I hurt, these hurts are tangible to me. These are realities. But the writing, once and a good while I question if I’m a great writer or even a good writer. I think about the people who tell me I’m good and I’m great. Some have books published, some don’t. One sits on a Foreign Relations council. Most, or indeed all the others don’t sit on anything like that. They sit in chairs or they sit around with me. But these people tell me I’m good and sometimes great. But I have doubts, maybe they’re lying. Maybe, maybe. Maybe not? I question their credentials, even the professors with NEA fellowships and Pushcart Awards. They’ve seen my pain in my prose, but at times I just think they feel sorry for me. They tell me pretty words about my writing so I don’t flounder around their offices.
But maybe it’s me who feels sorry for me? Maybe I'm causing my own hurt.
Can’t be not I, the great writer who is in pain and hurt and so on and so on and so on (forth).
But pain, I’m in pain right now. I don’t really know why. But, to me and only me, it’s substantial. I’m lying in bed in pain dealing with my writing. Or is it dealing with my pain while lying in bed writing? Or writing in bed while dealing with my lying? Or lying with my dealing in bed, pain? No, maybe it’s dealing with my bed while pain writes me a letter? Wait, what letter? Hmm, maybe it’s dealing with my—
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Sunday, October 17, 2010
Personality Extremities and the Middle Ground
I tend not to think of myself as a deeply serious man. Serious enough, maybe serious like a serious hangover but not serious like nuclear talks with Iran serious. So that’s that. But most people see me as serious, introverted, closed off. Of course, I question why; in my head and in turn play off these misconstrued typecasting. If I had to pinpoint myself into a set personality type I would go with dramatic; dramatic in all sense of the world, theatrical even. As an adult I always want to make common circumstances a serious matter, but I know doing this will only make it dramatic. I always have an existential dilemma toeing that line.
My flair for drama stems from a childhood of disconnect and a supple extent of alone time to cultivate my imagination. Drama is a way to get attention, and like all things that are beyond social norms, it catches attention.
A car crash, yes, I would stare until my eyes hurt then I would keep staring. A man wearing a dress, yet I would stare. Then I would judge the fit of the dress and the style. A child raging about cancer like his admittance into Jerry’s Kids was in the mail, yes, I would stare. That would be staring into a mirror, staring into the past. I would be staring a spectacle of poor timing, bad decisions and affected performances that would probably bring a tear to my eye. Good tear; let’s not take this the wrong way, I would cry from laughing.
Staring into that mirror would be comedic in one of those “bitter-sweet” ways. Because I have to look at my outlandish nature with humor or I might fall into a somber state.
As a child I was a hypochondriac, I still am to some extent. Not nearly as bad as the seven year old version of myself, peering through a compendium of human diseases and internal disorders. Children should not experience this level of neurosis at the age of seven. Maybe ten or eleven, when the weight of the looming beast that is middle school starts to rear its head. But neurosis at seven is absurd. Perhaps that is just my own social perception on the matter.
Now for the vast majority of my life I have had this inclination for the grandest and at times most obscene way to deals with situations. I would take those arguments with my first girlfriend to levels of neat Shakespearean drama. These petty arguments would spill across phone calls, hand written notes and the ever present AIM. I told her she was evil, more than once. In reality she wasn’t and I thought I was being serious. I wasn’t. The fallout from a fistfight would lead one to believe I just cold clocked a heavy weight contender and downed them. Post fight me would be elevated to Olympia Heights; although this was mostly in my head.
In my teenage years I had an inclination toward recreational drug use. So of course me stoned would be a parade of underwhelmed emotions brimming to the surface. “I’m so fucking high,” I would say. “I can see everything. The molecules, my heart beat, my breathing. I’m having a fucking heart attack. (Author’s note: while I’m fictionalizing that dialogue blurb, yes, that happened more than once.) However, the beauty of that type of a downer meant whatever dramatic inclination I might be leaning to would be quelled with more dope or more pills or more, well, downers.
Teenagers are socially aware of how they might be perceived in situations. It was around my mid teenage years when I became aware of what “cool” might be interpreted as. This is where my level of seriousness came from. If I were stone faced, snide, coy and calm I would be classified as “cool”. I would save my dramatic panache for closed doors where only immediate family and whatever girlfriend would be treated to a private show of tantrums and vaudeville.
Common knowledge of the self-aware teenage male means they cannot be seen as a sissy in the confines of public space. Hence, serious Michael Tesauro. If the tragic performances that I would give in my private life reached the rest of my freshman to senior classmates, I would be stereotyped as a “wuss”. We all know that’s no way to go through high school, I know because I tormented those kids.
Putting up a front is a logical way to deal with insecurities and absurd levels of neurosis for a teenager. It’s logical because all teenagers do it. The true test of character lies in the transition into adulthood. Does the dramatic/serious Michael Tesauro enter his adult life as such. Yes and no. I suppose that being scared of one typecast would drive someone to another I wanted to be noticed in public so I acted a certain way. Absurdly austere and foggy eyed a solid chunk of my adolescence on one stage while red faced and driven by catastrophic monologues behind that velvet curtain. My image as serious amongst my peers was drastic and contrasting to what I thought was serious in my personal life.
While years of frowning and stern looks have cast me as a serious person, I still give a good show. For most serious people, authentic seriousness, my style of dealing with less than fortunate situations is absurd. Now as an adult I am faced with serious situations as I drive toward a college degree and starting a family. My serious demeanor has traded in for composed and articulate. My at home Grecian tragedies have been traded in for soap opera level drama. Easily quelled with a word from loved ones. But when situations are serious, bona fide serious, I never really know how to react to the situation.
A few weeks back, I had to deal with a state of affairs that was serious in the most authentic of ways. It involved my partners father and myself. I had to ask that serious question and me being me, I framed the inquisition in that exact manner. “Let me ask you a serious question…” and so on. Yet, I wondered I didn’t want to look stern or ridiculous in the process so I strived for a rational medium, articulation and a smile.
When a young man has to ask that serous question, the “can-I-have-your-daughters-hand” question, they are faced with the crisis of execution. They must figure out what route they have to go down. Now, as I understand, most young men try to seem serious, reliable and well mannered when diving into such levels of importance. Me, on the other hand have a history of the two extremes in electrified situations like this. Serious/dramatic.
Neither of which would help my case asking that question.
I wondered if I would have to pull her father aside and ask him with a stern jaw line and firm handshake. Maybe nod my head and present a rigid case to do so. But I would probably come across as humorless asshole. Now as I learned in high school the way you present yourself speaks to your peers and your elders. Of course I wouldn’t want to look like that. And then there’s option B kept in my back pocket.
The drama.
But in reality I would want to break into a flailing monologue to him about love and poetics and how she is my other half, so on and so forth with raining flower petals. That would make me look like a sopping and outrageous human being that is fit for a stage, possibly straightjacket. Finding a middle ground is a challenge.
I’ve learned that I can pair my theatrical leanings and my serious persona into rare instances of a lovely thing called boldness. I have always been known to be a bold, brash and otherwise forthright man. My thespian nature and my introversion meet in a lightning spark of boldness that couples the two and leads me to wonderful instance of adult life.
Bold is my middle ground.
So I approached this issue of a serious and life-changing question as bold. I asked him at the dinner, at the table in front of everyone. However, with bold comes calms for me, with calm comes lucidity. So I assumed his response would have been naturally a yes and in turn it was a yes. But I wonder what would have happened if it was a “no”, an concrete and serious “no”.
Would I have stood on the table, feet in the salsa bowls and torn my shirt? Maybe breaking into a monologue about despair and loneliness, then collapsing in a white-hot panic. Or sat calmly with a frown with grit teeth and a pulsing forehead vein. I can only hope I would counter bold with bolder. For me bold is level headed and that is a great way to go through life.
But if I did jump head first into the drama I would hope there would a tablecloth that I could use as a cape for my performance, adding that Michael, age 7 theatrical flair to my monologue.
Saturday, September 11, 2010
20 at 24 hours, awake.
Thursday, September 9, 2010
On Luck
Monday, August 23, 2010
Faith Based Learning
The greatest carnivore in history looms on the side of the road somewhere between Phoenix, Los Angeles and the desert sprawl in between. In his period of dominancy during the Cretaceous period, the Tyrannosaurus Rex was the master of all things destruction. He was fear itself. Now, his livelihood is the cherry atop a slice of Americana and religious conventions. The Tyrant King himself, condemned to a life plaster, rebar, metal wiring and an exterior support system so tourists can waltz through his interior while their children destroy the nearby restroom.
For those of us who live in the Los Angeles basin, we have seen this roadside attraction at some point in our lives. Before we have found ourselves in the midst of the sprawling meadows of air-powered windmills, we drive by the Cabazon Dinosaurs. A roadside attraction that has attracted film crews, Japanese tourist, teenagers stoned on dope and me when I was taking care of a little girl who wanted to see dinosaurs. It was closer than the Natural History museum on a Friday afternoon and I could snag a banana-date shake afterwards. Unfortunately I missed the roadside market and found myself peering from the inner jaws of a stucco monster.
I visited the antiquated structures of the booming 1960’s recently. In the vein of Pee Wee Herman and Jenny Lewis circa The Wizard, I wandered underneath the belly of a dinosaur shaped museum. While the initial kitsch factor made me giddy, the interior of the gift shop came as a surprise. Much to my pleasure, the gift shop was loud with Creationist propaganda. I had to suppress a laugh after the unibrowed employee shot me a disconcerted look as my girlfriend’s daughter asked me why we couldn’t touch the dinosaur models. It might have been because they were holy icons, the little one thought they would become real and the woman; I really can’t grasp what she believed on the matter. Nonetheless, no touching was done.
I never would have expected something so hackneyed to take a sharp turn for the bizarre. Posters of stegosaurus where coupled with a fresh verse from the book of Leviticus. A superimposed likeness of Jesus was atop a fiercely colored flying reptile in a scene that looked like a child’s coloring book mated with the New International Version. Nearly every square inch of the interior that was not plagued with plush dolls and motorized plastic figurines was saturated with Biblical adages that apparently prove the dinosaurs were made of a Christian God and not through evolution.
Normally, I would snicker at these declarations of faith for being so affected and so obvious. My liberal-agnostic-leaning sentiments would lean to remarks about Moses fighting off megafauna with his olive tree staff during his stay in the wilderness. I would have even taken a picture on my phone and sent it to other sardonic friends to mock the irony of these egregious claims. But this was not so, instead I watched in horror as flocks of bright eyed children swarmed around the toys that were strategically placed underneath these posters. The Creationists who ran the exhibits were not only wrapped in the bosom of religious zealotry, they were coy. They followed the old proverb of “get ‘em while they’re young”.
My horror came not for me, all of 23 and sour toward religious institutions but for my tiny companion. Accompanying me was a four year old; who, while clever to slightly shocking measures, was still four years old. As she stood under a rousing poster playing with a foam dinosaur age I realized how keen these Creationists actually were. Take a quizzical young lady like her; add toys and propaganda and you can sink a hook of interest. The Creationists, much like the carnivorous dinosaurs gracing the “walk-back-through-time” exhibit took full advantage of youth. While they challenged or at least sparked curiosity in adults, they could snag a child with their overwhelming bombardment on the senses.
As I stood there with the little one, listening to her chat in a singsong like trance I thought back to my own childhood. I grew up in with private school education. Even more so, the faith based learning that was spouted upon my classmates and I in our early stages of critical education. I recall engaging with an academic agenda similar to the thunderous posters tacked throughout the museum gift shop. While I was taught through pointed science books with Biblical affirmation to back these posters harkened the education I received. But I can’t say I fully beat this style of learning, since I will always remember what I learned regardless if I believe it or not.
I wonder if the little one, like myself will recall that someone somewhere told her Jesus of Nazareth walked with the dinosaurs. I wonder if the appeal to youth will take hold of her as she might look up once or twice the posters and recall that a bearded man is embracing a reptilian creature that was long dead before he came to prominence with claims miracles and slight of hand tricks. That of course is just me being cynical, but regardless of how I felt I still remember being taught that. With that in mind I whisked my young companion away from the toys and thought I would try my luck at the robotic dinosaur walk through.
After paying 17 dollars for our way into the exhibit, we looked upon a robotic dinosaur mouth opening and closing in succession. The mechanical movement of the jaws of some creature that was claimed to devour men like me in single bites was not the least scary. Even my tiny companion wasn’t impressed. Having put the fear of exposure to ridiculous religious notions out of my head, I moved us to the next exhibit. There we watched the shaking head of a triceratops, my personal favorite as a child. This dinosaurs neighbor, an armor clad statue of a knight with a lance, seemed to heighten the urgent sense of lunacy that dripped from the walls of the fine desert museum.
Now I can see how Creationism is backed. I can picture why and how people believe such things, but the collage of robotic dinosaurs and an Arthurian knight was the topper. I imagine the look she had on her face was similar to mine. Shock. While hers was more the “how does this work?” look mine was the “what the fuck?” look. Without discussion we kept moving, putting such a peculiar notion behind us. And when she said, “I’m scared of this place,” I wanted to admit that I was too. But I had to muster up my skills as a caretaker and move us to the garden walkthrough that brought us back even further back in time. I decided that if I was visibly shook by this place then maybe the fear of God and his Jurassic pals would be tangible to her.
In the desert garden we walked amongst the fiercest creatures of their day. I pictured that this was what the disciples did according to the Creationist beliefs. I might be wearing a goatskin tunic and she would be in something adorable and fitting to the era, perhaps a silk garb. She would be on my shoulders and we would stroll through olive groves while plesiosaurus and therizinosaurus watch us with doleful, passive eyes. We might hear of the latest miracle by the daring Jesus then the girlfriend and I would join friends for wine recently converted from water. Yet, in reality it was very hot and the statues were fading from the sun beaten years they had spent out in the trail.
At the end of the garden we made it to the terrible lizard himself. She wanted to see up stairs, all three flights of them and we made it to the inner jaws. On the way up we passed more posters expressing belief. I noticed that these had become more aggressive than the ones in the museum shop. As though these announcements presented a challenge to the brave who made it this far into their compound. My particular favorite read: EVOLUTION, WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE! The little one had not noticed and I could breathe easier.
When we sat in the jaws of Tyrant King and looked at the sprawling desert past the blacktopped parking lot I wondered what she would take from this. I was nostalgic of American gaudiness, but would she get feel anything when she passed this attraction in her adult years? I hoped that our visit to the dinosaurs would trigger a flood of tacky statues, poor animatronics and fun. Not Creationism. For me it complimented the thought that a strange concept like Creationism would dwell away from a major city, but not far from a casino. Out in America’s deserts people could practice worship freely and if they felt it necessary, house their beliefs in giant hollow dinosaur monuments.
As we walked through the parking lot, the sun was setting. A desert wind had picked up. The mini was roosting on my shoulders with handfuls of my hair and pomade for good measure. I asked her if she had fun and she answered yes. But she questioned why we hadn’t seen any bones, real bones. She wondered if they were under the ground, the same one I was walking above. I answered probably because I hoped they were. I hoped that dinosaurs would be as mysterious to an adult as they would a four year old. I hoped that their bones were deep down in the earth’s crust, away from the side of the Interstate 10 freeway, away from religion.
I caught the jaws of Tyrannosaurus Rex in my rearview mirror as we entered the onramp. He was smiling about something, maybe it was the fact that I had spent the day wandering in his innards or maybe it was the fact that I would miss my exit for a banana-date shake. He might have been laughing at how ridiculous the whole thing was. It might turn out that Creationists were right. It’s prospective. But I don’t really know and neither do the Creationists. But like childhood memories and values of faith, these possibilities will be rooted up in time.
Monday, July 26, 2010
We And Only We Are Right
I’m sitting in the captain’s chair of this classroom. As it turns out, not even the instructor, a published novelist has this seat, I do. But that’s in my mind, so hey, I can make that call. But here I am, captain, king, alpha-male in a room full of Stephen King fan’s and adult women with orthodontic gear. And there’s instructor, he’s been talking for an hour and fifty-two minutes. I’m listening to him talk about a novel written by a young British upstart. He alludes to an argument between the protagonist and her lover as a form of sword fighting. He says parry as he twists his exposed wrist and pale arm in an effete manner, supposedly mimicking a counter draw cross of the saber.
I’m not concerned with this speech my professor is giving though. I’m still in my own world, suspended above a blizzard peaked mountain in my captain’s chair. Just above, slightly higher than my supposed peers. I hear nasal voices and the whistle of hot breath through metal braces with pink plastic bands. We are in a creative writing lecture. And I’ve deemed myself the best. I do this every time I set foot in a workshop. I eyeball, size up, belittle. I am standoff-ish. I daydream myself out of the monotony of style choice lectures and writer’s craft.
When the talk of fleche attacks as word tags and counter attacks as dialogue breaks reaches it’s highest point I find myself counting tiles on the floor. The soiled linoleum has been rolled over and scuffed with the black plastic chairs we are sitting on. Even my captain’s chair. I’m imaging myself doing hopscotch. My right foot is in the third square and my single barrel whiskey with purified water is spilling. The radiant ice cubes frosted over inside my glass tumbler. My dusty sombrero has just fallen off when I reach the fourth square, switching feet (yes, I’m wearing a sombrero in my daydream. It’s normal). I’m drawn from the game inside myself when a classmate brings up an idea for a short story.
A young man dared to interrupt the instructor while he was knee deep in a fencing pose and explaining to us how the character’s discourse is “sharp”. The silence grows in the room as the professor sits down then looks long and deep in to the young man’s eyes. And he says, “I’m glad you asked that.” He’s not glad, nor am I. Nobody is. Now we have to engage ourselves in a discussion about writing.
Mr. Winter (our professor) can no longer enact his fantasies of eloquent duels in front of a group of gawk eyed science fiction worshippers. I can no longer elevate myself in my captain’s chair and watch myself play hopscotch in the bosom of Valhalla. The rest of the students can’t mentally masturbate to images of lush otherworldly planets, visceral red-crested dragons, laser beams and whatever else genre writers think about. Now we must come back to real life. We are harkened from whatever universe we have created for ourselves in the confines of our daydreams. Some are more fantastic than others, but the intent in cerebral escape is the same.
The problem with putting a group of people who have various interests in writing into the same room is that no one really knows how to deal with each other. I can’t fathom having a conversation with my neighbor at our desk table about whatever he claims to read (the book cover shows a desert landscape with two sunken moons) and I can’t understand him from way up in my lavish, velvet captain’s chair. Mr. Winter clearly can’t handle the thought of interacting with a human being in opposition to his invented sword-fight. We are a room of people who don’t know how to deal with other people close but very unlike ourselves. We are all in our respective captain’s chairs.
When I started writing I assumed everyone had read Ernest Hemingway. I imagined we would all sit in captain’s chairs in some smoky Creole billiard’s room having in-depth conversations about an overuse of the word “edifying”. This, however, was not so. I learned that those of us who write acquire and develop very different ideas and creeds of what “good” writing is. We are unlike the mathematician’s who can unify in thought about the plausibility of a cosine function. But we are more unlike the philosopher’s who agree there is no “right” answer. In our minds only we are right, and that’s why we put our opinions on paper.
Now as our lethargic discussion comes to a head I find myself asking about character develop, past trauma, intent of actions and so forth (his story is about a women who is exposed to a flaccid penis in a dance club bathroom). While I listen to the writer, my classmate, propose his solution to the logistical problem of how the flasher snuck into the women’s bathroom I find my captain’s chair is floating away again. It’s taking me back to the empty ashen planes of my mind where I can play c-lo with John Steinbeck and Allen Ginsberg while we listen to the Wu Tang Clan. From the glassy eyed look sweeping across the face and fortified mouth gear of the girl to my right, I can see other student’s are checking out as well.
Even Mr. Winter, with left hand running through his slicked black hair and right hand dimly motioning the gestures of a feint-parry thrust combination with his thought up saber, has checked out.
This is an advanced college fiction workshop, where average human beings are forced to interact for a letter grade. We deal with it in our own ways. Some of us are enthusiastic about third person omniscient tense, some of us became grammar Nazi’s, a large amount (like myself) daydream. When this brief dialogue between the five or six of us who at least want that easy, easy A dies down, Mr. Winter starts back up with his fencing/characterization battle. As he bears down on his fallen opponent (the story’s womanizing antagonist), with his sharpened Ă©pĂ©e I find myself back in my captain’s chair.
I’ve escaped the girl next to me, punching away at her Blackberry. I’m miles away from the young man to my left nodding off. His spittle splayed across his wrinkled, vanilla colored T-shirt. I’m ancient forests and weathered countryside’s away from Mr. Winter. Apparently he’s still in Great Britain, and he has just cut the ear lobe off his fictitious opponent.
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
flight/fight
Thursday, July 15, 2010
afternoons in the countryside
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Cold War-Era Relations
I always eye Alex with a vague sentimentality of jingoism and suspicious, even though we’ve talked for years. The reason being is that Alex is Russian, he has a Russian accent, and he looks Russian. I assume he speaks Russian in the confines of his concrete embankment or some other heavily armed, heavily guarded lair. While, I assure myself that he, like myself is just another college student, my mind drifts into the Cold War mentality of the Reagan years, stacking haggard bricks up onto the Old Wall. Or at least in my mind the wall is there.
I picture each one of our awkward interactions where we've talked about civil engineering, the Red Army, Republicans, sports events and the wonders of the Internet to be another brick in our imaginary Berlin Wall. Another brick each time I toss a passing glance at his obtrusive, FabergĂ© of an Adam’s apple. A batch of mortar each time his squinting, bespectacled eyes hone in on my Hasidic nose, curved like the Bald Eagle that flies over my head. Floodlights and crow’s nest every time the mention of conflict comes up, be they on the Georgian border or in the Kandahar desert.
As it stands, Alex and I both have embraced the universality of college liberalism, and this is our point of departure past the normal customer-worker relationship. We both nod our heads gravely at the news of American deaths in whatever desert we’re attempting to take over. We’ve both expressed solidarity for a black president. We’ve both championed the idea of more money spent on our university.
However, through all these interactions with Alex and MSNBC as our mediator, I still have a lingering suspicious every time his accent, subtle yet remarkably and stereotypically Russian breaks through. His voice was dry like the crystalline vodka I pictured him drinking everclear vodka filtered through Eastern Bloc newspapers and potatoes under his Lenin poster while reading the Brothers Karamazov.
It took me some time to hear his voice, his true voice; husky and morose like the Kremlin era spies heard in a James Bond film. At first I thought he as slow, or drunk. I actually still thinks he drunk, on potato vodka, but that’s just me. But when he says juice, (he likes a fresh-squeezed orange juice) I hear the word “Jews”.
Now, I know logically that he wouldn’t ask for a fresh-squeezed Jews. It would be a fresh-squeezed Jew and I know logically that anti-Semitism is awful and doesn’t occur in college liberals like us. But I still hear it and I still picture him in deerskin ushanka with a dazzling hammer and sickle patch in center asking for a freshly-squeezed Jew as some sort of spy code for you’ve been caught and we’re taking you to the gulag.
Whenever he comes in we greet with a smile and passive wave then exchange hellos. I throw out my typical service industry greeting: “Hey, insert name here. How’s it going?” Alex has his greeting: “Hey Matt, good.” It would seem that a large amount of my suspicious come from action films and general misanthropy. At times though, not remembering someone’s name draws out my suspicions. My name has not, and will never be Matt. Nor Jerry, which he had a stint of calling me too.
There was a month or so when he acknowledged my name was in fact Mike and he used it. His accent made “Mike” sound like “meek”. This came across as an under-handed insult, chalk full of the dreary Russian sarcasm. Meek wasn’t as big as an insult as him calling me Matt. I pictured him calling me Matt was some sort of name-calling native to the bitter, windswept plains of Siberia. As though calling me meek was slowly breaking down what was left of my American fortitude. After so many corrections, I gave up and let myself be called Matt. It’s better than meek.
I can trace my dislike of Alex to his treatment of his girlfriend. Although she is a rather plain girl, she makes up for it with cheeriness and an affirmative attitude that foils his somber demeanor. When the two come in together he sits at the cafĂ© table and she orders for the two. I’m pro-his girlfriend (I still haven’t learned her name) based on the fact that she smiles. It’s a white-toothed, red-lipped American smile that has yet to break across the jowls of Russia’s finest exchange student.
American Girlfriend orders for the two and waits with certain pensiveness for their drinks. When I finish she takes them back to the table where she usually doesn’t sit down. After dropping off the ceramic mugs filled with steaming black coffee she is sent back for milk. I picture him waving his wrist at her and simply saying, “Milk, I need this,” before sending her away.
Admittedly, I don’t know how the Russians or shall I say Russian men treat they’re women. My knowledge of Russian women come from the dejected mail-order brides paraded across the night-time headline news and Bridgette Neilson as Ivan Drago’s wife in Rocky IV. I pictured Alex having one of these women by his side, completing his twitchy, small mouth and gangly limbs. I’m not sure if these fictional Russian women would put up with his passive-aggressive demanding like his current girlfriend. But then again, I’m not sure about Alex in general.
Alex’s mother once came in and the two were speaking Russian. She was not like these stereotypes that have been cast onto the American audience. She looked tired, had an uneven haircut, crow’s feet circling her eyes and drooping mouth. She looked like Alex. I wonder if she used to waiting on some man, Alex’s father perhaps, much like the American Girlfriend. Alex, however, waited on his mother. She sat and sent him off to the counter so he could order two of the fresh-squeezed Jews that he spoke of with reverence. Alex hung about his mother's side with a pensiveness similar to American Girlfriend. When they left the cafĂ© he held her hand like a child after punishment, dejected and clingy, walking pigeon toed in his leather sandals. He never brought in his mother again.
The longest conversation I had with Alex about his Russianness lasted about twenty minutes. He was born in Siberia in a small village. I picture Siberia being a plague of small villages speckled with frozen military wreckage from the Kremlin’s heyday. His father had left the family, at some point in his youth, for the burning skies of California. Alex followed suit some point after his adulthood. Now we go to the same university in southern California. That’s as much as he offered me that afternoon. Perhaps the heat, the lack of subservient American Girlfriend and the wool socks/leather sandals combination drove him into my cafĂ© where he could open up to a stranger. An American stranger at that.
While he talked about his father, a proud look washed over him. His normally rounded and oddly small chin seemed to jut out with dignity. As though a square chin is reserved for talks about Russian fathers and hero's. His usually brown, pebble-like eyes were bold and glowing. I picture his father being a handsome, scientist-spy or state dignitary. The little details that Alex offered about his father made him seem like a character in a novel, some ex-patriot who escaped when life was cruel. His father worked in a lab in Russia, he was respected, now he lives in San Jose. He doesn’t like the Sharks hockey team.
Once we talked about the Second World War, a subject that should never be brought up between people of differing nationalities. While I cut the navel oranges for his fresh-squeezed Jew, a Ken Burns documentary heralded from the television mounted above the sink of my cafĂ©. “It makes me proud,” Alex said as he stood twitching on the opposite side of the marble counter. I turned and looked at him, knife in hand, apron soaked in orange pulp and we met eyes. “What’s that?” I asked him, hoping to avoid a rant of the Communistic flavor. “I’m proud as a Russian because the Red Army defeated Hitler and ended the war,” he said with an added clenched fist and head nod for full cinematic effect.
While I am not the history buff I believe most young people should be, I know Alex and I were bound to have learned different versions of this War’s outcome. My history lessons on this War ends with two bombs named after body types dropped on the island of Japan. Alex’s history lesson ends with the Russian winter that crippled the German offensive. This moment between us, at the counter in my cafĂ© was the flair of Cold War-Era Relations. We stacked bricks between us, one by one, with each second that passed. I was holding a knife and he, I fantasize had a Kalashnikov strung to his back by a surplus, canvas strap.
“It’s good the German’s lost,” I said, hoping to ease the awkward tension springing up. I pictured Gorbachev’s purple beauty mark spreading across Alex's head and shining emerald paper George Washington’s spilling out of my mouth and nostrils. His Russianness and my Americanism were bold, with the marble counter as our Bering Strait. These things didn’t happen and we agreed at least it wasn’t the Germans. While people of nationalities will always have tension, they can always converge with a severe dislike for other nationalities. Alex and I bonded over a ephemeral hatred of Germans until we realized, or at least I did, that we are in California, our President is black, that schnitzel is a stupid name for a food snack and that Alex and I are both bonded by the universality of college liberalism.
Alex still comes in and gets his fresh-squeezed Jew. He sometimes ventures into the coffee side of things (his pronunciation of latte isn’t amusing in the least bit). Alex, along with American Girlfriend still exit his silver Honda Civic customized with a Russian Empire Coat of Arms on the hood. We still nod heads about the grave and serious issues that affect the United States. Alex still calls me Matt. I still find him to be a shifty, more-likely-than-not spy.
As I hand him his juice or coffee, which ever it may be, our hands might briefly touch. The contact between our grazing knuckles reaches across our imaginary wall, across the border of vague ideologies and minor suspicious. We are straddling the invisible wall with uncomfortable bodily contact, fingers touching might one day lead to a handshake. A handshake might lead to a beer at the campus pub. We’ll break down our imaginary wall, brick by brick, addressing each strange Cold War notion that us, as children of the 1980’s had ingrained in our heads.
We might hug and I might learn his American Girlfriend's name and we can be great friends. Or I graduate college and quit my job at the café, leaving behind thoughts of Alex, his beady, doubting Russian eyes and our great imaginary wall that represents little more than strange social interactions and garish nationalism by two liberal college students.